Waist and abdominal perimetry: distinct points for cardiometabolic risk stratification 

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62827/nb.v23i2.3017

Keywords:

Metabolic syndrome; obesity; exercise; life style; primary health care.

Abstract

Introduction: Waist circumference is an important parameter for assessing cardiometabolic risk. Objective: Measure and compare two different anatomical references in order to check whether these two variables can be applied with the same objective in the determination of cardiometabolic risk. Methods: 80 apparently healthy men and 77 women (18-55 years) were selected. Anthropometric points were measured waist circumference (between the last rib and the edge of the iliac crest) and abdominal circumference (above the umbilical scar). Subsequently, they were submitted to the normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and homogeneity test (Levene test). Then, the unpaired t-student test was applied and the results presented as mean ± standard deviation. The significance level adopted was (p<0.05) and analyzes were performed using SigmaPlot for Windows version 11.0, copyright© 2008 Systat Software, Inc. In addition, the difference and delta percentages of the respective groups were calculated. Results: The female group showed a significant difference between the anthropometric points (p=0.001), a percentage difference of 46.8% and a percentage delta of 53.2%. Men showed no statistical difference, a percentage difference of 1.25% and a percentage delta of 1.25%. Conclusion: It was observed that, in women, the different anthropometric measurements differ not only in the anatomical point, but also in their perimetry. Furthermore, large part of the sample evaluated would be classified incorrectly if the CAB was adopted as the cutoff point, instead of the CC, as demonstrated in the calculations of the percentage differences and also in the percentage delta.

Author Biographies

  • Tiago de Oliveira Chaves, UFRJ

    Doutor em Educação Física, Grupo de Pesquisa em Avaliação e Reabilitação Cardiorrespiratória, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Clóvis de Albuquerque Maurício, UFRJ

    Mestre em Educação Física, Grupo de Pesquisa em Avaliação e Reabilitação Cardiorrespiratória, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Michel Silva Reis, UFRJ

    Doutor em Fisioterapia, Grupo de Pesquisa em Avaliação e Reabilitação Cardiorrespiratória, Faculdade de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

References

Anchuelo AC, Martínez-Larrad MT, Serrano-García I, Pérez CF, Serrano-Ríos M. Body fat anthropometric indexes: Which of those identify better high cardiovascular risk subjects? A comparative study in Spanish population. PLoS One. 2019;14(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216877.

Malachias MB, Souza WB, Plavnik FL, Rodrigues CS, Brandão AA, Neves MT, et al. 7ª diretriz Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;107(3 Suppl 3):1-103.

Associação Brasileira para o Estudo da Obesidade e da Síndrome Metabólica. Diretrizes brasileiras de obesidade 2016/ABESO. 4ª ed. São Paulo: ABESO; 2016.

Chaves TO, Reis MS. Abdominal Circumference or Waist Circumference? Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2019;32(3):290-2. doi:10.5935/2359-4802.20180080.

Zerga AA, Bezabih AM, Adhanu AK, Tadesse SE. Obesity Indices for Identifying Metabolic Syndrome Among Type Two Diabetes Patients Attending Their Follow-Up in Dessie Referral Hospital, North East Ethiopia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:1297-304. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S242792.

Kotseva K, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Rydén L, Jennings C, Gyberg V, et al. Lifestyle and risk factor management in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. A report from the European Society of Cardiology European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) IV cross-sectional survey in 14 European regions. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(18):2007-18. doi:10.21037/cdt.2017.04.06.

Chang M, Lee HY, Seo SM, Koh YS, Park HJ, Kim PJ, et al. The impact of educational attainment on cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(17). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000019865.

Weiderpass E, Botteri E, Longenecker JC, Alkandari A, Al-Wotayan R, Duwairi QA, et al. The Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in an Adult Kuwaiti Population in 2014. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:449. doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00449.

Molina-Luque R, Romero-Saldaña M, Álvarez-Fernández C, Rodríguez-Guerrero E, Hernández-Reyes A, Molina-Recio G. Waist to Height Ratio and Metabolic Syndrome as lung dysfunction predictors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7212. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64130-0.

Petroski EL. Antropometria: técnicas e padronizações. Santa Maria: Pallotti; 2003.

Rossi L. Nutrição em Academias do Fitness ao Wellness. São Paulo: Roca; 2013.

Mbanya VN, Kengne AP, Mbanya JC, Akhtar H. Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip-ratio and waist-height-ratio: which is the better discriminator of prevalent screen-detected diabetes in Cameroonian population? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108(1):22-30. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2015.01.032.

Li R, Shi L, Jia J, Li Y, Yang Q, Ruan Y, et al. Differentiating the associations of waist circumference and body mass index with cardiovascular disease risk in a Chinese population. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):457-67. doi:10.1177/1010539512465306.

Stewart A, Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Ridder H. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK); 2011.

Elitok GK, Duru NS, Elevli M, Sağlam ZA, Karşıdağ K. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle School Children and Evaluation of Components of Metabolic Syndrome. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019;53(4):403-8. doi:10.14744/SEMB.2018.50479.

Özcan RK, Özmen SG. The Association Between Migraine, Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance, and Obesity in Women: A Case-Control Study. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019. doi:10.14744/SEMB.2018.09582.

Ji C, Xia Y, Tong S, Wu Q, Zhao Y. Association of handgrip strength with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in US adults: the national health and nutrition examination survey. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12. doi:10.18632/aging.103097.

Tremblay A, Bélanger MP, Dhaliwal R, Brauer P, Royall D, Mutch DM, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary intervention on physical fitness, physical activity habits and the association between aerobic fitness and components of metabolic syndrome in adults diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Arch Public Health. 2020;78:22. doi:10.1186/s13690-020-0399-0.

Zheng Q, Lin W, Liu C, Zhou Y, Chen T, Zhang L, et al. Prevalence and epidemiological determinants of metabolically obese but normal-weight in Chinese population. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):487. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08630-8.

Ng NY, Jiang G, Cheung LP, Zhang Y, Tam CH, Luk AO, et al. Progression of glucose intolerance and cardiometabolic risk factors over a decade in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A case-control study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002953.

Suliga E, Ciesla E, Głuszek-Osuch M, Rogula T, Głuszek S, Kozieł D. The Usefulness of Anthropometric Indices to Identify the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2598. doi:10.3390/nu11112598.

Malik MS, Qayyum W, Farooq A, Waqas A, Sukhera AB, Khalid MA, et al. Dietary Patterns, Exercise, and the Metabolic Syndrome Among Young People in Urban Pakistan (Lahore). Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2019;18(1):56-64. doi:10.1089/met.2019.0021.

Buchmann N, Spira D, König M, Demuth I, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. Frailty and the Metabolic Syndrome - Results of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(4):169-75. doi:10.14283/jfa.2019.15.

Katsa ME, Ioannidis A, Sachlas A, Dimopoulos I, Chatzipanagiotou S, Gil AP. The roles of triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and uric acid as predisposing factors for metabolic syndrome in healthy children. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;24(3):172-9. doi:10.6065/apem.2019.24.3.172.

Correa-Burrows P, Blanco E, Gahagan S, Burrows R. Cardiometabolic health in adolescence and its association with educational outcomes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(12):1071-7. doi:10.1136/jech-2019-212256.

Nasreddine L, Bachir N, Kharroubi S, Chamieh MC, Sibai AM, Hwalla N, et al. Anthropometric Cutoffs for Increased Cardiometabolic Risk Among Lebanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2019;17(10):486-93. doi:10.1089/met.2019.0033.

Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S, Williamson B, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, et al. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(2):379-84. doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.2.379.

Saklayen MG. The Global Epidemic of the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):12. doi:10.1007/s11906-018-0812-z.

Yamagishi K, Iso H. The criteria for metabolic syndrome and the national health screening and education system in Japan. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39. doi:10.4178/epih.e2017003.

Perona SJ, Rio-Valle JS, Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Rodríguez M, Fernández-Aparicio A, González-Jiménez E. Waist Circumference and Abdominal Volume Index Are the Strongest Anthropometric Discriminators of Metabolic Syndrome in Spanish Adolescents. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49(3). doi:10.1111/eci.13060.

Sareban Hassanabadi M, Mirhosseini SJ, Mirzaei M, Namayandeh SM, Beiki O, Gannar F, et al. The Most Important Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome Persistence after 10-year Follow-Up: YHHP Study. Int J Prev Med. 2020;11:33. doi:10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_215_18.

Pimentel GD, Portero-McLellan KC, Maestá N, Corrente JE. Accuracy of sagittal abdominal diameter as predictor of abdominal fat among Brazilian adults: a comparation with waist circumference. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:656-61. doi:10.3305/nh.2010.25.4.4507.

Published

2024-08-17

Issue

Section

Artigos originais

How to Cite

Waist and abdominal perimetry: distinct points for cardiometabolic risk stratification . (2024). Nutrição Brasil, 23(2), 813-823. https://doi.org/10.62827/nb.v23i2.3017

Most read articles by the same author(s)