Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy: An Integrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i7.1242Keywords:
Gastrectomy; Physical Therapy Modalities; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Quality of Life; Rehabilitation.Abstract
Introduction: Gastrectomy is one of the main surgical procedures used in the treatment of gastric cancer and other upper gastrointestinal diseases, being associated with physiological, respiratory, and functional changes during the postoperative period. Despite advances in surgical techniques and enhanced recovery protocols, patients undergoing this procedure remain susceptible to pulmonary complications, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, functional impairment, and prolonged hospital stay. In this context, physical therapy plays a fundamental role in preventing complications, restoring respiratory function, and improving functional independence through an integrated multidisciplinary approach. Objective: To analyze postoperative recovery strategies in patients undergoing gastrectomy, emphasizing physical therapy interventions aimed at preventing respiratory complications, promoting functional recovery, encouraging early mobilization, and improving clinical outcomes and quality of life. Methods: This is a descriptive and analytical literature review conducted through an integrative review methodology. The databases consulted were the Virtual Health Library (VHL), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), SciVerse Scopus (Scopus), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). Eight studies published between 2008 and 2023 were included, selected according to their relevance to postoperative recovery after gastrectomy, addressing aspects related to respiratory physical therapy, early mobilization, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, pulmonary complications, functional recovery, and quality of life. Results: The analyzed studies demonstrated that patients undergoing gastrectomy have an increased risk of respiratory complications and functional limitations resulting from surgical trauma, immobility, and reduced physical capacity. Early mobilization, therapeutic exercises, respiratory physical therapy, muscle strengthening, and structured rehabilitation programs showed benefits in preventing pulmonary complications, improving respiratory function, restoring functional independence, and reducing hospital length of stay. The implementation of ERAS protocols was highlighted as an effective strategy to integrate surgical, nutritional, and physical therapy care, promoting faster and safer recovery. Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that respiratory and motor physiotherapy, combined with early mobilization, therapeutic exercises, and optimized perioperative recovery strategies, may contribute to postoperative recovery in patients undergoing gastrectomy. However, the heterogeneity of the studies and interventions, as well as the presence of indirect or contextual evidence, limits the generalizability of the findings specifically to this population. Therefore, the observed benefits should be interpreted as potential contributions to functional and clinical recovery, and uniform effects on postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, functional independence, or quality of life cannot be established.
References
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Annals of Surgery[Internet]. 2008 [cited 2026 Jul 29];248(2):189-198. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a review. JAMA Surgery [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2026 Jul 23];152(3):292-298. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952
Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. British Journal of Surgery[Internet]. 2014 [cited 2026 Jul 21];101(10):1209-1229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9582
Carli F, Scheede-Bergdahl C. Prehabilitation to enhance perioperative care. Anesthesiology Clinics [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2026 Jul 29];33(1):17-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.002
Haines KJ, Skinner EH, Berney S. Association of postoperative pulmonary complications with delayed mobilisation following major abdominal surgery: an observational cohort study. Physiotherapy [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2026 Jul 29];99(2):119-125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2012.05.013
Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Esophagogastric junction cancer: current surgical management and future perspectives. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2026 Jul 29];4(4):375-387. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12347
Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2026 Jul 29];36(1):11-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer[Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Jul 29];26(1):1-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2026 Jul 12];52(5):546-553. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2026 Jul 12];372:n71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Stillwell SB, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice step by step: asking the clinical question: a key step in evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2026 Jul 12];110(3):58-61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miguel Miranda Vicentini, Luísa Costa Menezes, Fernanda de Oliveira Prado, Ana Clara de Souza Pereira Resck, Marcelle Ferraz Resck (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.