Association Between Sarcopenia and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: An Integrative Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i9.1312

Keywords:

Postoperative Complications; Physical Therapy Modalities; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Sarcopenia.

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcopenia is a condition characterized by a progressive reduction in muscle strength and mass, which may impair functional capacity and increase the vulnerability of patients undergoing surgical procedures. In the context of abdominal surgery, the presence of sarcopenia may be associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, slower functional recovery, prolonged hospitalization, and poorer clinical outcomes. In addition, surgical trauma, reduced physical activity, and the recovery period may intensify muscle loss and hinder the return to functional independence. In this context, the identification of sarcopenia and the implementation of exercise, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and prehabilitation strategies are relevant for preserving functional capacity and promoting recovery during the perioperative period. Objective: To analyze the association between sarcopenia and functional outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, with an emphasis on its impact on muscle strength, mobility, functional capacity, postoperative complications, and clinical recovery, as well as the contribution of physical therapy interventions, physical exercise, and pre- rehabilitation strategies to the preservation and recovery of functionality during the perioperative period. Methods: This is a descriptive and analytical literature review conducted as an integrative literature review. The following databases were searched: Virtual Health Library (BVS), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine (PubMed), SciVerse Scopus (Scopus), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). Studies published between 2020 and 2025 were considered, including observational studies, clinical trials, intervention studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing sarcopenia and outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Evidence related to muscle strength and mass, functional capacity, mobility, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, physical recovery, prehabilitation, therapeutic exercise, physical therapy, and multimodal perioperative preparation and recovery strategies was included. At the end of the selection process, 12 publications were classified according to their direct or indirect relationship to the population and the guiding question.  Results: The analyzed studies demonstrated an association between sarcopenia and poorer outcomes in patients undergoing different abdominal surgical procedures, including gastrointestinal, colorectal, hepatic, and pancreatic surgeries. Reduced muscle mass and strength were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications, poorer physical recovery, greater clinical vulnerability, and, in some contexts, increased length of hospital stay and mortality. Studies involving patients undergoing abdominal surgery also indicated that preoperative identification of sarcopenia may assist in risk stratification and in planning recovery strategies. In parallel, interventions based on physical exercise, resistance training, prehabilitation, and multimodal programs involving exercise and nutritional support showed potential to improve functional capacity and reduce vulnerability associated with low muscular reserve. However, part of this evidence was obtained from specific surgical populations or from studies that did not exclusively select patients with sarcopenia; therefore, its applicability should be interpreted within the appropriate clinical context. Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that sarcopenia is an important factor associated with poorer functional and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, being related to reduced muscle strength, impaired functional capacity, a higher risk of postoperative complications, and more complex recovery. Strategies involving physical therapy, physical exercise, resistance training, prehabilitation, and multimodal approaches may contribute to preserving or recovering functionality during the perioperative period, particularly when implemented early in patients with greater muscular vulnerability. However, the heterogeneity of surgical procedures, methods used to identify sarcopenia, interventions, and evaluated outcomes, in addition to the presence of indirect or contextual evidence, limits the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, the results should be interpreted as evidence of a relevant association between sarcopenia and poorer outcomes following abdominal surgery, reinforcing the importance of functional assessment and multidisciplinary care, including physical therapy, in preventing functional decline and promoting perioperative recovery.

Author Biographies

  • Daniel Cardoso Pereira, AFYA

    Afya Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Ipatinga, Ipatinga, MG, Brasil

  • Tatielle Pedrosa Novais, UFLA

    Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG, Brasil

  • Audrey Tue Domingos Diniz Cambraia, FAME-FUNJOB

    Faculdade de Medicina de Barbacena (FAME-FUNJOB), Barbacena, MG, Brasil

  • João Victor Cordeiro Guedes , FADIP

    Faculdade Dinâmica Vale do Piranga (FADIP), Ponte Nova, MG, Brasil

  • João Paulo de Araújo Pelegrini, IMEPAC Centro Universitário

    Médico CRM 84817 RQE 61735 pela IMEPAC Centro Universitário, Araguari, MG, Brasil

References

Berardi G, Cucchetti A, Colasanti M, et al. Prehabilitation With Exercise and Nutrition to Reduce Morbidity of Major Hepatectomy in Patients With Sarcopenia: The PREHEP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Aug 30];160(10):1068-1075. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3102

Keshavjee S, McKechnie T, Shi V, et al. The Impact of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The American Surgeon [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Aug 30];91(5):887-900. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251329748

Zhang QH, Ma JD, Lu YM, et al. Sarcopenia adversely impacts clinical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Aug 30];16(6):1857-1870. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1857

Ricci C, Alberici L, Serbassi F, et al. Physical Prehabilitation in Patients who Underwent Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using GRADE and CINeMA Approach. Annals of Surgical Oncology [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Aug 30];31(3):1725-1738. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14632-8

Wu J, Chi H, Kok S, et al. Multimodal prerehabilitation for elderly patients with sarcopenia in colorectal surgery. Annals of Coloproctology [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Aug 30];40(1):3-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01207.0172

Steffens D, Nott F, Koh C, et al. Effectiveness of Prehabilitation Modalities on Postoperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. Annals of Surgical Oncology [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Aug 30];31:7822-7849. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15593-2

Knoedler S, Schliermann R, Knoedler L, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Aug 30];109(12):4238-4262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000688

Park B, Bhat S, Xia W, et al. Consensus-defined sarcopenia predicts adverse outcomes after elective abdominal surgery: meta-analysis. BJS Open [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Aug 30];7(4):zrad065. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad065

Erkul O, Cekic AB, Cansu A, Yildirim R, Guner A. Effects of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Journal of Surgical Research [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 Aug 30];274:196-206. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.051

Yang J, Chen K, Zheng C, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 Aug 30];13(5):2383-2392. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13040

Waterland JL, McCourt O, Edbrooke L, et al. Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2026 Aug 30];8:628848. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.628848

Pipek LZ, Baptista CG, Nascimento RFV, et al. The impact of properly diagnosed sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2026 Aug 30];15(8):e0237740. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32822372/.

Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2026 Jul 12];52(5):546-553. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2026 Jul 12];372:n71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Santos CM, Pimenta CA, Nobre MR. A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2026 Sep 22];15(3):508-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Association Between Sarcopenia and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: An Integrative Review. (2026). Fisioterapia Brasil, 27(9), 5706-5729. https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i9.1312

Most read articles by the same author(s)