Prevention of lymphedema and functional recovery following mastectomy: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i7.1266

Keywords:

Lymph Node Excision; Physiotherapy; Mastectomy; Breast Cancer; Lymphedema.

Abstract

Introduction: Lymphedema is one of the main chronic complications observed in women undergoing surgical treatment for breast cancer, especially after mastectomy associated with lymph node dissection. This condition may cause increased upper limb volume, pain, functional limitations, impaired quality of life, and increased postoperative morbidity. Objective: To investigate the effects of physiotherapeutic interventions on the prevention and reduction of lymphedema related to the postoperative period following mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) protocol. Randomised clinical trials and controlled clinical studies that evaluated interventions such as resistance training, therapeutic exercises, manual lymphatic drainage and preventive strategies were included. The risk of bias was critically assessed and also evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between physiotherapeutic interventions and control groups regarding the incidence of lymphedema. However, the studies demonstrated improvements in the functionality of the affected limb and did not show a significant increase in adverse events. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that physiotherapeutic interventions are not superior in preventing the incidence of post-mastectomy lymphedema. Nevertheless, these strategies appear to be safe and potentially beneficial for patients’ functional recovery and physical rehabilitation.

Author Biographies

  • Jéssica Amanda Lopes, UIT

    Universidade de itaúna (UIT), Itaúna, MG, Brasil

  • Luiza Veiga Reis Costa Pinto , UNIVÁS

    Médica pela Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre, MG, Brasil

  • Paula Vieira Penha, UNIVÁS

    Médica pela Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí (UNIVÁS), Pouso Alegre, MG, Brasil

  • Thiago Nani dos Santos, FUNORTE

    Médico CRM 116795 pelas Faculdades Unidas do Norte de Minas (FUNORTE), Montes Claros, MG, Brasil

  • Sophia Lara Guerra Souza, FAME

    Médica pela Faculdade de Medicina de Barbacena (FAME), Barbacena, MG, Brasil

References

Naughton MJ, Liu H, Seisler DK, Le-Rademacher J, Armer JM, Oliveri JM, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes for the LEAP study—CALGB 70305 (Alliance): a lymphedema prevention intervention trial for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2021;127(2):300-9.

Ammitzbøll G, Johansen C, Lanng C, Andersen EW, Kroman N, Zerahn B, Hyldegaard O, Wittenkamp MC, Dalton SO. Progressive resistance training to prevent arm lymphedema in the first year after breast cancer surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2019;125(10):1683-92.

Fan YJ, Xu HQ, Li H, Zhang ZR, Zhang SF, Du AJ, et al. Effects of resistance training at different intensities on preventing breast cancer-related lymphedema: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2026;26(1):204-12

Oliveira MMF, Gurgel MSC, Amorim BJ, Ramos CD, Derchain S, Furlan-Santos N, et al. Long term effects of manual lymphatic drainage and active exercises on physical morbidities, lymphoscintigraphy parameters and lymphedema formation in patients operated due to breast cancer: a clinical trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189176.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71

Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123(3).

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2019.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.

Paskett ED, Le-Rademacher J, Oliveri JM, Liu H, Seisler DK, Sloan JA, Armer JM, Naughton MJ, Hock K, Schwartz M, Unzeitig G, Melnik M, Yee LD, Fleming GF, Taylor JR, Loprinzi C. A randomized study to prevent lymphedema in women treated for breast cancer: CALGB 70305 (Alliance). Cancer. 2021;127(2):291-9.

Xue T, Zhang L, Zhang D. Exercise-based interventions for postoperative rehabilitation in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(34):e43705.

Sharifi N, Ahmad S. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: a critical review on recent progress. Surg Oncol. 2024;56:102124.

Basha MA, Aboelnour NH, Alsharidah AS, Kamel FH. Effect of exercise mode on physical function and quality of life in breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(3):2101-10.

Panchik D, Masco S, Zinnikas P, Hillriegel B, Lauder T, Suttmann E, et al. Effect of exercise on breast cancer-related lymphedema: what the lymphatic surgeon needs to know. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019;35(1):37-45.

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Prevention of lymphedema and functional recovery following mastectomy: A systematic review with meta-analysis. (2026). Fisioterapia Brasil, 27(7), 4930-4944. https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i7.1266