Comparison of the effectiveness between Bubble CPAP and Conventional CPAP in preterm newborns in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v27i2.1142Keywords:
Premature; Noninvasive Ventilation; Neonatal Intensive Care Units.Abstract
Introduction: Preterm newborns frequently require care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and respiratory support, such as conventional continuous continuous airway pressure (CCPAP) and bubble continuous airway pressure (BCPAP), used to assist respiratory function. Objective: This study described the results and efficacy of bubble CPAP versus conventional CPAP in the treatment of preterm newborns (PTNBs) in the NICU. Methods: This is a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA method, with searches in the PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Latin American and Caribbean Literature (LILACS), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases. Descriptors related to CPAP and preterm newborns were used. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Results: Of the 860 articles identified, 9 studies with a PEDro score greater than 7 were included, totaling 937 PTNBs. In 55.5% of the studies, BCPAP showed better results compared to CCPAP, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. In the remaining studies, the results were similar between the methods. Conclusion: The findings indicate that BCPAP may offer clinical advantages, associated with its simplicity, lower cost, and reduction of complications, although some of the literature demonstrates equivalent efficacy between the two devices. In most of the studies analyzed, BCPAP proved more advantageous than VCPAP in the treatment of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units.
References
Arzamendia Rozas JP, Camargo CR, Fernandes I. Desfecho da utilização do CPAP bolha e CPAP convencional no tratamento da síndrome do desconforto respiratório em neonatos prematuros. Ciência da Saúde [Internet]. 2023 mar 26;27(120). Avaliado por: https://revistaft.com.br/desfecho-da-utilizacao-do-cpap-bolha-e-cpap-convencional-no-tratamento-da-sindrome-do-desconforto-respiratorio-em-neonatos-prematuros/. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7772023.
Agarwal S, Maria A, Roy MK, Verma A. A randomized trial comparing efficacy of bubble and ventilator derived nasal CPAP in very low birth weight neonates with respiratory distress. J Clin Diagn Res [Internet]. 2016;10(9):SC09-SC12. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27790540/. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/20584.8572.
Buia CB, Panga MA, Sehgal B, Theda C, Berger PJ, Nold MF, et al. Hipertensão pulmonar associada à displasia broncopulmonar em prematuros. J Reprod Immunol [Internet]. 2017;124:21-29. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2017.09.013.
Wu AG, Klein JR, John SC, Slusher TM, Fischer GA, Brearley AM, et al. Reported complications of bubble continuous positive airway pressure systems in low-resource settings: an international survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg. [Internet]. 2023;109(1):214-216. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37188346/ doi:10.4269/ajtmh.23-0065.
Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Chandrasekaran A, Agarwal R, Paul VK. Eficácia e segurança do CPAP em países de baixa e média renda. J Perinatol. [Internet]. 2016 maio;36(Suppl 1):S21-S28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27109089/. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.29.
Ministério da Saúde. Portaria GM/MS nº 930, de 10 de maio de 2012. Diário Oficial da União. 2012 maio 10.
Gupta S, Donn SM. Continuous positive airway pressure: to bubble or not to bubble?. Clin Perinatol. [Internet]. 2016;43(4):647-659. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27837750/. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2016.07.003.
Instituto Fernandes Figueira – Fiocruz. CPAP nasal. Portal de Boas Práticas IFF/Fiocruz. 2020. [citado 15 jan 2025]. Disponível em: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/atencao-recem-nascido/cpap-nasal/.
Richard C, Hamm E, Emery L, Jeanvoine A, Moore-Clingenpeel M, Sowers B, et al. Effects of two non-invasive continuous positive pressure devices on the acoustic environment of preterm infants. J. neonatal nurs. [Internet]. 2020;26(3):167-170. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S135518411930136X.doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2019.09.008.
Oliveira JdS, Pozzebon BR, Santos KPP, Silveira LBTD, Cruz DBB, Eberhardt TD, et al. Lesões nasais associadas ao uso de pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas em neonatos prematuros. Braz J Dev. [internet]. 2022;8(10):68019-68032. Available from: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BRJD/article/view/53251.doi:10.34117/bjdv8n10-195.
Dundek ML, Ng EK, Brazil AM, DiBlasi RM, Poli JA, Burke TF. Evaluation of a bubble CPAP system for low resource settings. Respir Care. [Internet]. 2021;66(10):1572-1581. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33824173/. doi:10.4187/respcare.08948.
Filho JD. Impacto do uso de CPAP em sala de parto sobre a incidência de displasia broncopulmonar e óbito em prematuros de muito baixo peso [dissertação]. Paulista (SP): Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP); 2020.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Panam Salud Publica.[internet].2022;46:e112. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33782057/. doi:10.26633/RPSP.2022.112.
Verhagen AP, De Vet HCW, De Bie RA, Alphons GH. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. [Internet]. 1998;51(12):1235-1241. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10086815/. Doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00131-0.
Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. [Internet]. 2010;362(23):2235-2243. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20472939/. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0911783.
Hosseini MB, Heidarzadeh M, Balila M, Ghojazadeh M, Janani R, Safavi-Nia S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: underwater bubbly CPAP vs Medijet system device. Int J Pediatr. [Internet]. 2015;3(4):632-640. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23692790/. doi:10.22038/ijp.2015.4513.
Bahman-Bijari B, Malekiyan A, Niknafs P, Baneshi MR. Bubble-CPAP vs. ventilatory-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress. Iran J Pediatr. [internet]. 2011 Jun;21(2):151-158. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23056781/.
Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A, Patole S. A pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs ventilatory CPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. [Internet]. 2009;56(3):191-194. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19843596/ doi:10.1093/tropej/fmp092.
Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A, Patole S. Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr. [Internet]. 2013;59(2):113-119. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23306407/. doi:10.1093/tropej/fms070.
Yagui ACZ, Vale LAP, Haddad LB, Prado C, Rossi FDS, Deutsch ADA, et al. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). [Internet]. 2011;87(6):499-504. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22170173/. doi:10.2223/JPED.2145.
Bhatti A, Khan J, Murki S, Sundaram V, Saini SS, Kumar P. Nasal jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. [Internet]. 2015;35(11):935-940. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26270255/. doi:10.1038/jp.2015.98.
Shadkam MN, Movahedinia M, Shadkam ZN, Mehrparvar AH. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of bubble CPAP and ventilator CPAP on respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates. Iran J Neonatol. [Internet]. 2017;8(3):1-5. Available from: https://ijn.mums.ac.ir/article_9357_b547b2712c513ac7e2ffd06282cf6047.pdf. doi:10.22038/ijn.2017.18835.1215.
Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus infant flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. [Internet]. 2009;154(5):645-650. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19230906/. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.034
Liu C, Zhu X, Li D, Shi Y. Related factors of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. [Internet]. 2021;8:1-13. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.605879.
Prakash R, De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Oddie SJ, McGuire W. Positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7:CD015130. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD015130.
Wu AG, Klein JR, John SC, Slusher TM, Fischer GA, Brearley AM, et al. Reported complications of bubble continuous positive airway pressure systems in low-resource settings: an international survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg. [Internet]. 2023;109(1):214-216.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37188346/. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.23-0065.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cibelle Luiza Oliveira , Altafico Fernandes de Oliveira, Clóvis Henrique de Melo Siqueira, Mariana Balduino Aguiar, Natasha Yumi Matsunaga (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.