Analysis of the quality of description of usual care interventions in clinical trials involving exercise for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v25i1.j161

Keywords:

knee osteoarthritis; patient care; exercise.

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment for Osteoarthritis (OA) includes exercises, educational and self-management programs, with new therapeutic interventions often compared to "Usual Care". Objectives: To investigate the quality of description of Usual Care as a comparator group in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using exercise in the treatment of knee OA through a Systematic Review (SR). Methods: A search will be conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PEDro, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases to identify RCTs that used Usual Care as a comparator in the treatment of knee OA with exercise. After selection, eligible studies will be assessed by a pair of trained researchers. The PEDro scale will be used to evaluate the risk of bias, with each study classified as "poor," "fair," "good," or "excellent," and intervention description will be assessed using the TIDieR checklist. The quality of the intervention descriptions in each RCT will be classified as "High" if the score is equal to or greater than 50% of the total score, or "Low" if it is lower. Unpaired t-tests and the chi-square test will be used for the evaluation of numerical and categorical variables, respectively. Expected Results: The results of this review are expected to summarize the quality of intervention description in RCTs in OA that are often inadequately described, especially concerning the control group, making replication in RCTs and comparison between tested therapies challenging. A well-constructed SR protocol is necessary to help clarify uncertainties about interventions generically referred to as Usual Care.

Author Biographies

  • Lucas Henrique Caldas , UNIFAP

    Fisioterapeuta pela Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brasil

  • Paula Gabrielly Oliveira Demes, UNIFAP

    Graduanda de Fisioterapia na Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brasil 

  • José Neto, UNIFAP

    Mestrando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), da Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brasil 

  • Nívea Renata de Oliveira Monteiro, UNIFAP

    Mestranda no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brasil

  • Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto, Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano

    Pesquisadora do Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, Espanha e Centro Cochrane do Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil; Docente do Curso de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Departamento de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Macapá, AP, Brasil

  • Areolino Pena Matos , UNIFAP

    Docente e Pesquisador do Curso de Fisioterapia do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), da Universidade Federal do Amapá, (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brasil

References

Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. novembro de 2019;27(11):1578–89. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011.

Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2010;18(4):476–99. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.

Arienti C, Buraschi R, Pollet J, Lazzarini SG, Cordani C, Negrini S, et al. A systematic review opens the black box of “usual care” in stroke rehabilitation control groups and finds a black hole. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2022 [citado 31 de agosto de 2022];58(4). DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07413-5

Goh SL, Persson MSM, Stocks J, Hou Y, Lin J, Hall MC, et al. Efficacy and potential determinants of exercise therapy in knee and hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. setembro de 2019;62(5):356–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.04.006

Abbott JH, Robertson MC, Chapple C, Pinto D, Wright AA, Leon De La Barra S, et al. Manual therapy, exercise therapy, or both, in addition to usual care, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized controlled trial. 1: clinical effectiveness. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013;21(4):525–34. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.12.014.

Pisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, De Bakker DH, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized controlled trial comparing two different physical therapy interventions. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2010;18(8):1019–26. doi: 10.1002/art.23009.

Wallis JA, Webster KE, Levinger P, Singh PJ, Fong C, Taylor NF. A walking program for people with severe knee osteoarthritis did not reduce pain but may have benefits for cardiovascular health: a phase II randomised controlled trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2017;25(12):1969– 79. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.017

Yu AM, Balasubramanaiam B, Offringa M, Kelly LE. Reporting of interventions and “standard of care” control arms in pediatric clinical trials: a quantitative analysis. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(3):393–8. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0019-7

Paci M, Risaliti F, Pellicciari L. Reporting of “usual care” as the control group in randomized clinical trials of physiotherapy interventions for multiple sclerosis is poor: a systematic review. Neurol Sci [Internet]. doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06167-9

Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. doi.org/doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687

de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2009;55(2):129–33. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70043-1

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;n71. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. doi.org/doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647

Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions : Cochrane Book Series. 2023. doi:10.1002/9780470712184

Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT, Catley MJ, Moseley AM. Rasch analysis suggested that items from the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist can be summed to create a score. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;101:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.014

Barros BS de, Imoto AM, O’Neil J, Duquette-Laplante F, Perrier MF, Dorion M, et al. The management of lower back pain using pilates method: assessment of content exercise reporting in RCTs. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2022;44(11):2428–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1836269

Shiwa SR, Costa LOP, Moser AD de L, Aguiar I de C, Oliveira LVF de. PEDro: a base de dados de evidências em fisioterapia. Fisioter mov. 2011;24(3):523–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-51502011000300017

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. agosto de 2010;63(8):e1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583

Downloads

Published

2024-05-14

Issue

Section

Protocolos de estudo

How to Cite

Analysis of the quality of description of usual care interventions in clinical trials involving exercise for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review protocol. (2024). Fisioterapia Brasil, 25(1), 1275-1284. https://doi.org/10.62827/fb.v25i1.j161

Most read articles by the same author(s)